Showing posts with label Software. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Software. Show all posts

NASA extends Mars lander mission, search for water

Phoenix Lander
An artist's drawing shows how the Phoenix Lander would look on Mars.
(Credit: NASA/JPL)
A correction was made to this story after it was published. See below for details.
NASA's planning to spend another month and $2 million on its Mars robotic lander mission to obtain more icy soil samples, study the weather, and size up the planet's suitability for human life.
In a press conference Thursday, NASA scientists said that the Mars Phoenix Lander mission has been going so well that it plans to extend the vehicle's stay through the end of September, instead of August. On May 25, the Phoenix landed more than 200 million miles away from Earth, on the edge of a volcano in the northern hemisphere of Mars, and has since confirmed the existence of frozen ice on the Red Planet.
Part of the goal of the extended mission is to continue studying icy soil samples in the area of the Lander. Just Wednesday, scientists said that the Phoenix's robotic arm picked up a sample of Mars soil and put it into its onboard oven--an act that prompted celebration among the project leads. Early analysis of the sample proved the existence of a small amount of H20 because the ice melted, but the scientists ultimately want to collect a sample with a larger composition of permafrost, they said.
"We're looking to understand the history of the ice, trying to figure out if it's ever melted, see if its chemistry has changed. Getting back this analysis, we'll hope to be able to answer questions like (whether this is) a habitable zone on Mars," said Victoria Hipkin, mission scientist for Phoenix Meteorological Station at the Canadian Space Agency.
NASA is particularly looking for organic materials, but it has yet to find them. One hypothesis is that the soil might contain a strong oxidant, according to one of the NASA scientists. Instead, it has found potassium--among other minerals--a clay-like component, and properties it has yet to identify.
Phoenix lander scoop and soil
The robotic arm of the Phoenix lander has been digging into Martian landscape in search of ice and water. The color inset shows a closeup of the red Martian soil. For a full photo gallery, click on the image.
(Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona/Max Planck Institute)
 
One goal of the extended mission will be to dig two more trenches around the site of the lander and study their soil. NASA plans to name the trenches with fantasy names like its other ditches--Snow White and Goldilocks. The new ones will be named Cupboard and Neverland.
"We have lots more to explore within reach of the robotic arm," said Peter Smith, Phoenix's principal investigator from the University of Arizona at Tucson.
Phoenix is also giving the scientists their first details about weather in the Mars arctic. The extended mission will help NASA better understand seasonal changes from springtime in Mars, when it landed, to high summer, to the end of the mission in its fall time frame. For example, the team is using sophisticated sensors to measure the atmosphere's pressure, humidity, and winds. So far, the sensors have shown maximum wind speeds of 15 miles per hour on Mars.
One of the mission's requirements was to capture a color panoramic view of the landing site with its on-board 1-megapixel digital camera. The Phoenix team completed that task stitching together more than 400 images taken from the lander over a month's time. According to the team, it took about 15 relay passes to download the data--100 megabytes' worth--from the craft. The image confirmed water ice underneath the site of the lander.
Through August and September, the team plans to get a "Happily Ever After" panoramic image, with more than 1,500 high-resolution pictures stitched together from the site. NASA expects that collection of images will be about two-thirds of a gigabyte and take 100 orbital passes to download. The panoramas help bring context to the terrain and mission, and help the scientists pick future spots for investigation.
The significance of all this? "We've gotten to the point where we're pretty sure we found water, and determined it was H20. One of the things (with upcoming missions will be) moving away from finding water to a search for life," said Michael Meyer, chief scientist of the Mars Exploration Program at NASA.

Next version of Office heads to the browser

After years of questioning the value of Net-based productivity applications, Microsoft confirmed Tuesday that it will offer new versions of Word, Excel, and PowerPoint that can run from within a standard Web browser.
As first reported by CNET News last week, Microsoft will use its Professional Developer Conference here to show off browser-based versions of its Office programs.
Click for gallery
In an interview, Microsoft Business Division President Stephen Elop said that the browser-based editing capabilities are being developed in conjunction with the next version of Office, known as Office 14. Microsoft won't say when that version will arrive, but Elop said that a technology preview of the browser-based products will come later this year and that a beta version will be released in 2009.
Microsoft will offer browser-based Word, Excel, and PowerPoint in two ways. For consumers, they will be offered via Microsoft's Office Live Web site, while businesses will be able to offer browser-based Office capabilities through Microsoft's SharePoint Server product.
The company has been pushed into this arena by Google, which has been offering its free Google Apps programs for some time. In competing with Google, Microsoft is touting the ability to use Microsoft's familiar user interface, as well as the fact that all of the document's characteristics are preserved.
"If you go into some competitive products right now and take a Word document in and then spit it out afterword, it's unrecognizable," Elop said. "You lose a lot of fidelity.
Elop said that not all of the editing capabilities of the desktop products are in the browser versions. "The editing we are characterizing as lightweight editing," he said.
Although Google Apps has seen most of its popularity among consumers, it has started to attract attention from corporate customers. Google Apps got a strong look from Procter & Gamble, which only decided to stick with Office after a strong push from Microsoft. Part of that pitch, Elop said, included Microsoft offering details on its plans for the Web-based versions of the Office programs.
"This was part of the conversation, absolutely," Elop said. "We have been sharing with customers under varying circumstances to a greater or lesser extent."
Although he didn't name names, Elop said Microsoft has found itself in a competitive situation with Google in other business accounts as well.

Images: Ubuntu's Intrepid Ibex on the loose

 
  

Intel warns on chip demand

Intel reiterated in an SEC filing Friday that business conditions may worsen and that demand for its chips may take a hit because of global economic conditions.
As a result of the recent financial crisis, "there could be a number of follow-on effects from the credit crisis on Intel's business, including insolvency of key suppliers resulting in product delays; inability of customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products and/or customer insolvencies," Intel restated in a FORM 10-Q filing.
Intel also cited "increased expense or inability to obtain short-term financing of Intel's operations from the issuance of commercial paper."
"The current uncertainty in global economic conditions makes it particularly difficult to predict product demand," Intel said, reiterating what was stated in its third-quarter earnings announcement.
(Intel also plans to publish a mid-quarter business update on December 4, 2008.)
For the fourth quarter of 2008, Intel reiterated that it expects revenue of between $10.1 billion and $10.9 billion and a gross margin of 59 percent, plus or minus a couple points. Gross margin is a crucial indicator of profitability. The company repeated that economic uncertainty may result in lower than expected demand and may "negatively impact our gross margin if we fail to reduce manufacturing output accordingly."
Restructuring and asset impairment charges--as stated in its third-quarter earnings announcement--will be approximately $250 million, which includes charges related to Intel's joint decision with Micron to discontinue the supply of NAND flash memory from a facility within the Intel-Micron manufacturing network.
iSuppli warns on flash memory revenue
And speaking of NAND flash memory, iSuppli said Friday that its revised forecast for the flash memory market predicts that worldwide NAND flash memory revenue will fall by 14 percent to the $12 billion level in 2008, down from $13.9 billion in 2007.
This year will mark the first time that worldwide NAND flash revenue has declined on an annual basis.
In 2009, global NAND flash memory revenue will decline by another 15 percent, iSuppli said.

Yahoo offers SearchMonkey experiments

Programmers who might not make the cut for Yahoo's official SearchMonkey gallery now have a new experimental option for propagating their ideas for augmenting Yahoo search results.
"Starting today, even if an app doesn't meet all of the gallery guidelines, it will still be quickly approved as an experimental app provided the basic functionality operates as designed and we don't initially see any other major issues with it," said Nick Cox of the Yahoo search team on the Yahoo Search blog Friday.
SearchMonkey embeds selected search results into more elaborate packaging. For example, a restaurant appearing in the search results can change from a name with a Web site link into that plus an address, phone number, map, and customer reviews. Programmers create SearchMonkey applications that present the fancier results; SearchMonkey apps are enabled by default from Zagat, CitySearch, Yelp, LinkedIn, and Yahoo Local.
With the experimental option, Yahoo expects the early-adopter crowd will help programmers refine their SearchMonkey applications faster. "We think the early feedback that these users can provide will be extremely helpful for developers," Cox said. "This also gives users who opt-in an even wider variety of apps from which to choose."
SearchMonkey, part of Yahoo Open Strategy, is one element of Yahoo's attempt to make its site more useful and more used. Also in search, Yahoo offers BOSS (Build Your Own Search Service) that lets others repackage, reorder, and remix Yahoo search results--with revenue-sharing or Yahoo-supplied advertising if the service gets popular.

Windows 7: A better Vista?

Microsoft on Tuesday offered up far more details on Windows 7, successor to the company's oft-maligned Windows Vista.
In particular, Microsoft is focused on improving the time it takes for Windows to start up and shut down. In addition to its own work, Microsoft has been working directly with computer makers to address all of the factors that affect system performance.
As far as other features, Windows 7 features support for multitouch input and a new taskbar that makes it easier to manage multiple open Windows.
Click for gallery
"The focus is on making sure the things you do (today) are easier and that the things you always wanted to do are possible," Corporate Vice President Mike Nash said in an interview Monday. "There's a lot of work we've done to just make things easier and faster.
The early, prebeta version being handed out to developers at the Professional Developer Conference here has all of the programming interfaces that will be in the final version but only some of the planned features.
Several enthusiasts who have been checking out the new code for the past couple of days praised the stability of the release, particularly for an operating system, at this early stage.
With Windows 7, Microsoft has changed the way it approaches building early releases. In the past, Microsoft included features at various stages of development. With Windows 7, features are included in the main Windows build, only after they are fully baked.
Microsoft is clearly looking to leave a far different first impression than it did with Windows Vista, which made major changes under the hood and led to considerable incompatibilities. With Windows 7, Microsoft is not introducing any major changes to the Windows kernel and is keeping much of the other plumbing substantially similar to that of Vista.
The software maker has also tried to reduce some of Vista's other annoyances, such as the frequently criticized User Account Control feature, which some complained led to too many annoying dialog boxes. With Windows 7, users will be able to choose for themselves how often the system warns them of changes being made to their computer.
The next external release of Windows 7, a feature-complete public beta, is slated for early next year.
Nash wouldn't say whether the company plans more than one beta version before its final release. "We'll see how the first one goes," he said.
The company has said it will have the release out within three years of Vista's January 2007 mainstream release, however, CEO Steve Ballmer has said he wants Windows 7 out next year.

Azure manages to avoid a Hailstorm of criticism

Microsoft's Hailstorm prompted an avalanche of criticism when it was proposed seven years ago, but developers seem to have few qualms with Windows Azure, which embraces many of the same notions.
With Windows Azure, Microsoft not only controls the operating system but also the data centers where the applications run and the servers where the information is stored. If anything, Microsoft's control has grown, not shrunk, from the vision that the company outlined in 2001.
So why the lack of uproar this time?
Timing is a huge factor. For one thing, Microsoft's image has changed dramatically from the one it had when Hailstorm was introduced.
"It was the evil empire against Java and open source," independent analyst Peter O'Kelly said. Even Microsoft's code name was off-putting.
"When you think Hailstorm, you think destroy my garden, not helping me," O'Kelly said.
Azure slide
A slide from Microsoft's introduction of Azure Monday at its Professional Developers Conference.
(Credit: Robert Vamosi/CNET News)
The industry has also changed dramatically. Companies have gotten a lot more comfortable with the notion that corporate information can live outside a business' own data center.
"Salesforce.com is the big one that broke through that glass ceiling," O'Kelly said.
Microsoft corporate VP David Treadwell doesn't dispute the notion that there are elements of today's strategy that can be traced back to Hailstorm.
"You are implying correctly that Hailstorm was kind of before its time," he said in an interview.
Microsoft has also learned from its experiences, Treadwell said.
With Hailstorm, Microsoft insisted on owning the relationship with the customers. Now, the company is talking about the notion of federated identity and cooperating with OpenID.
And, while Microsoft is big, it is no longer the only behemoth.
Much of Google's vision is downright audacious relative to what Microsoft proposed with Hailstorm, O'Kelly said. "Fundamentally, their mission is very clear. It is to organize all of the world's information. You are part of the world's information."
Security and trust
Also, while the data may live in Microsoft's data centers with Windows Azure, it can also be encrypted and other measures can be taken to make sure that it stays proprietary.
Azure gives companies the ability to tightly control the security of the data, said Jordan Ellington, vice president of legal technology at global firm Transperfect. Companies can encrypt the data at the server and send it encrypted over Microsoft's network and unencrypt it at the client.
"We wouldn't let Microsoft actually host our data. We're just using them as plumbing," Ellington said. Whereas, "small companies are not threatened by the intellectual property issues because it's a cheap service."
"I don't see, for quite some time, large corporations putting all their information in the cloud; it's too attractive of a target," he said.
But businesses now have to evaluate not just the theory of whether allowing others to hold their data is a good thing. The reality is that, in many cases, large third parties may be able to do more to protect a company's data than some mid-size firms can do on their own.
"Organizations have come to say, 'let's compare it to practical alternatives as opposed to some Utopian ideal," O'Kelly said.
Plus, Windows Azure is still at the community preview stage, so businesses will have time to kick the tires before it's even ready to host their mission-critical applications.
"It's no different from paying any other hosting company," said Troy Farrell, solutions architect for Operitel Corp., which provides software management services for e-learning. "I guess some people genuinely distrust Microsoft because of their size, like some people distrust Google, which is hosting and storing data in Google Apps and other services," he said.
Trust is indeed an issue with cloud computing, Ray Ozzie told CNET News earlier this week. But Microsoft believes that trust may help them in this area, particularly when it comes to competing with Google.
"Cloud computing is ultimately going to be, do you trust this provider to have more to lose than I have to lose as a company if they mess me up?" Ozzie said in an interview. Ozzie said Microsoft is well-positioned to garner that trust, both because of the scale of its investment and because it is putting its money where its mouth is--building its own Azure-based applications.
Still, Ozzie said he'd expect businesses to move in waves, first moving infrastructure type things and only later moving business applications.
Even those who don't really trust Microsoft have options.
"Microsoft never has to see anything you are doing," said Alberto Ramirez, a developer at consultancy Tallan. Information "can be encrypted on both ends. They're just passing it along."
Microsoft may also benefit from the constraints of a tighter economy.
"There is demand for this, especially now," Ramirez said. "IT departments are scaling back. This requires no IT staff and no server in a room. And the security is taken care of."

Third Chrome beta another notch faster


On the SunSpider JavaScript peformance test, the new Google Chrome beta edges closer to TraceMonkey-enhanced Firefox. But the cutting-edge 'Minefield' version of Firefox edges ahead, too.
On the SunSpider JavaScript peformance test, the new Google Chrome beta edges closer to TraceMonkey-enhanced Firefox. But the cutting-edge 'Minefield' version of Firefox edges ahead, too.
(Credit: CNET News)
Google began updating Chrome users with the new beta version, and my performance tests show the company has ratcheted the browser's speed up another notch.
Google Chrome's latest version, 0.3.154.9, shows a 37 percent JavaScript performance improvement over the initial beta released two months ago.
JavaScript is a programming language used to add some pizazz to innumerable Web pages, but more importantly from Google's perspective, to power sophisticated Web applications such as Google Docs, Google Calendar, and Gmail. JavaScript is also up against Adobe Systems' Flash and Flex, Microsoft's Silverlight, and HTML 5, in the competition for what's the best foundation for Web applications.

Google has begun automatically updating all Chrome users to the new 0.3.154.9 beta version.
Google has begun automatically updating all Chrome users to the new 0.3.154.9 beta version.
(Credit: CNET News)
Using Google's JavaScript benchmark I pitted the newest Chrome beta, version 0.3.154.9, against both the initial beta from September and the more raw 0.3.154.3 developer release from mid-October. A higher number is better on this test, and the first beta scored 1,851, the 0.3.154.3 developer release 2,265, and the new 0.3.154.9 beta 2,546.
Google's tests aren't the only game in town; many use the SunSpider test. Here, too, the new Chrome got a notch faster, getting the test done in 2,546 milliseconds compared with 2,904 milliseconds for 0.3.154.3. (We couldn't test the first version because the testing site was down at the time.)
The new Chrome score catches closer to the 2,250 millisecond score of Firefox 3.1 beta 1 with its new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine enabled. (Tech-Recipes has useful instructions on how to enable TraceMonkey.)
On blogger Matt Asay's advice, I tested Minefield, the cutting-edge version of Firefox that's updated daily. (Minefield is downloadable from Mozilla's FTP site for those willing to use very untested software).
It had the best SunSpider score so far on my machine, 2,147 milliseconds. However, Firefox still lags on Google's speed test. Chrome's latest score of 2,546 is miles ahead of the 215 score from Minefield.

The latest beta version of Google Chrome is a notch faster on Google's JavaScript speed tests. The cutting-edge 'Minefield' version of Firefox takes a step back from the 3.1 beta 1.
The latest beta version of Google Chrome is a notch faster on Google's JavaScript speed tests, where a larger number is better. The cutting-edge 'Minefield' version of Firefox takes a step back from the the 3.1 beta 1 of Firefox, without the new TraceMonkey JavaScript engine enabled. All the Firefox versions trail Chrome on this test significantly.
(Credit: CNET News)
There could be something fishy going on here, though: Minefield, which has TraceMonkey turned on, actually is slower than Firefox 3.1 beta 1 with TraceMonkey turned off, which is hardly the result you'd expect for a JavaScript speed test. TraceMonkey-enabled Firefox 3.1 beta 1 couldn't run the test because of a bug, and though that bug was fixed in Minefield, there could be something else awry.
And again with the caveats: These tests were run on a dual-core Windows XP machine, and your mileage will undoubtedly vary. They're synthetic benchmarks that may not accurately represent all the particular JavaScript you have to run. And JavaScript isn't the sole measure of a browser's speed.

Senior Microsoft Executive Will Poole Joins NComputing as Co-Chairman and Board Member as Co-Chairman and Board Member



NComputing, the leading provider of desktop virtualization software and hardware, today announced that Will Poole, Corporate Vice President of Microsoft’s Unlimited Potential Group and former head of the Windows Client Business, has joined NComputing as co-chairman and member of the board of directors. He brings 25 years of knowledge from the personal computer industry to NComputing as well as recent experiences co-leading Microsoft’s Unlimited Potential initiatives. Poole will serve as a global ambassador for NComputing in developing countries and support expansion efforts in new markets and geographies. He will also draw on his numerous experiences with leading-edge and disruptive technologies and business models to help guide NComputing’s corporate strategy.

“NComputing has a practical and proven technology that breaks the affordability barriers that most schools, businesses and governments in developing economies face,” said Poole. “Working with NComputing allows me to pursue my passion for addressing some of the most important global development issues via sustainable and eco-friendly technologies, including NComputing’s innovative virtualization solutions built on Windows.”

Poole joined Microsoft in 1996 through the acquisition of eShop Inc., a company he co-founded in 1991 and ran as president and chief operating officer. Prior to eShop, Poole spent five years at Sun Microsystems, working in senior marketing and engineering management roles. At Microsoft, Poole led various business development efforts, ran the Windows Digital Media Division for three years, and in 2003 assumed leadership of the Windows Client Business. For the past two years, Poole co-led Microsoft’s Unlimited Potential Group, which spearheads a companywide effort to create social and economic opportunity for the next 5 billion people—those in the middle and bottom of the world’s “economic pyramid”—with a focus on transforming education, fostering local innovation, and creating jobs and opportunities. In that role, Poole led development of Windows Starter (which has now been sold to over seven million first-time PC users around the world), championed Microsoft’s partnership with the One Laptop per Child organization, and built relationships worldwide with government and business leaders.

“With NComputing now exceeding a million unit annualized run rate, we’re poised for substantial and rapid growth. We are excited to have Will join us to guide our strategic direction and assist us in forging relationships with governments and other technology companies,” said Stephen Dukker, NComputing CEO and chairman. “We look forward to drawing from his experiences and relationships as we take NComputing to the next level.”



The NComputing solution is based on a simple fact: today's PCs are so powerful that the vast majority of applications only use a small fraction of the computer's capacity. NComputing's virtualization software and hardware tap this unused capacity so that it can be simultaneously shared by multiple users. Each user's monitor, keyboard, and mouse connect to the shared PC through a small and very durable NComputing access device. The access device itself has no CPU, memory or moving parts so it is rugged, durable, and easy to deploy and maintain, which is especially critical in developing nations. The NComputing solution costs as little as $70 per seat. More than 20,000 organizations in over 90 countries use NComputing solutions every day.

“NComputing has the potential to reshape the computing landscape and Will joining the company should substantially increase their potential for success given his background and contacts,” said Rob Enderle a leading technology analyst from the Enderle Group. “Education and commercial buyers are looking for ways to make their limited resources stretch to cover their growing needs and NComputing is uniquely suited to help many do exactly that.”





About NComputing, Inc.

Winner of the Wall Street Journal's Technology Innovation Award, NComputing, Inc. was founded with the goal of making desktop computing affordable for everyone. Headquartered in Redwood City, CA, NComputing is a privately held virtualization software and hardware company. The company's patented technology drastically lowers desktop computing costs, improves manageability, and reduces both energy consumption and e-waste. For more information and NComputing, visit http://www.ncomputing.com.



Media Contacts:
Renee Deger
GlobalFluency
(650) 433-4153
rdeger@globalfluency.com

NComputing is the next Google

Once in a while we come across a company whose idea and products just make sense. Ncomputing is such a company and it may take some time until you will hear more about its products, but we do believe that the firm has what it takes to popularize cloud computing for the masses and become Intel’s biggest threat yet. We are talking about the ability to split one PC into possibly dozens of sub 5-watt computers with a cost of less than $100 each. To us, it is the first convincing cloud computing idea that has the potential to reach more users than any other computing product before.
Nine years ago, my editor-in-chief asked me to research a then new Silicon Valley start-up and interview the company’s president for a brief article. Back then, there were thousands of start-up and to deal with one specific one was just another story and you did not expect to hit anything spectacular. The PR director of the 45-people-strong start-up welcomed me in what he called “half-baked” offices and led me to the president’s office, a Stanford student who seemed to be more excited about his 3D mouse and was not concerned about dirty dishes taking up more than half the space of his desk. It was your average over-the-top Internet start-up environment, but this company had a fresh idea how to make information on the Internet available to users and its idea how to monetize that idea was called crazy at the time. But once I had seen the technology in action and had met the minds behind it, I told my editor-in-chief that this company would replace Yahoo and our Internet publication should change its advertising model.
The company today has more than 16,000 employees, the president was Sergey Brin and the company was Google.
Ncomputing feels just like it. It operates under the radar of the big boys, but makes visible progress in a high-growth area that needs innovation. To me, Ncomputing can be, with determination and luck, the next Google. Here is why.
Ncomputing: How to create an $11 computing device
Last week, Cherrypal launched its $250 cloud computer with an innovative approach to attract average computer users who don’t want to edit videos and play games, but simply browse the Internet, write emails, watch YouTube and create simple documents. Following the story, we were contacted by a representative for Ncomputing – a company I had not heard of at the time – and an offer to provide information about a “$70 PC”. We finally had a chance for a briefing with the company’s chairman and CEO, Stephen Dukker (founder and former CEO of eMachines), to learn more about this cheap PC.
Realistically, calling the Ncomputing devices PCs is not correct, since these boxes do not carry components you would expect to find in a PC – such as a processor, memory or storage devices. Instead, the purpose of the Ncomputing devices is to tap into the horsepower of a single PC to enable the creation of multiple computing stations. The computing devices are access terminals that share the performance provided by a host PC. Up to seven computing devices of Ncomputing’s X-series connect via direct connections, the L-series supports up to 30 users via Ethernet.
Each box carries a minimum of hardware with the main component between an ASIC. The result is an extremely low production cost of about $11 per seat, according to Dukker.
Hardware and software
The base version of Ncomputing’s product line is the X-series. The devices connect via CAT 5 cable to a PCI card with three Ethernet ports that is installed in a host PC. Since there are typically two free PCI ports in a PC, the technology supports up to six connections to Ncomputing boxes. Add the host PC as a computing device and you end up with seven Internet “computers”. Dukker said that a $350 PC with a basic Core 2 Duo processor and 1 GB of memory is enough to power this platform and run, for example, MPEG-2 playback, TV playback via a Sling Player, YouTube video playback, DVD video playback, as well as productivity applications such as Microsoft Word, PowerPoint and Acrobat Reader at the same time.
The power consumption of each computing device is rated at about 1 watt. Since this version uses direct connections, the maximum distance between a host PC and a computing device is 10 m or about 30 ft. The X-series comes in a $200 package, which includes one PCI card and three access terminals – which translates into a cost of $66.67 per seat (not including the host PC.)
The L-series supports up to 30 computing devices, priced at $150 per seat. The connections are established via Ethernet an Ncomputing claims that a $500 quad-core server would be enough to run all 30 devices, which are rated at a power consumption of 5 watts each.
X-series and L-series networks are glued together by a virtualization software that was developed by a European company (that was merged into Ncomputing) called Hydrapark. This software layer creates a self-contained user environment under one operating system provided by the host PC (Linux and Windows are supported.) Ncomputing bundles the software with the hardware free of charge and claims that it could scale the application to potentially hundreds of seats.
What the $70 computing device is and what it is not
Clearly, there is a reason why these computing devices are called access terminals and not PCs. You can’t use these devices for gaming or video editing. But you can use them to create a relatively cheap network of general purpose network computing units that are powered by one capable PC. If Internet, email and basic productivity applications as well as media playback is all you need on multiple computers, then an Ncomputing package is all the hardware you need to build a network of Internet computers in your home.
At this time, Ncomputing targets specific corporate and institutional applications areas such as manufacturing environments, education and government. It is also a product that is aimed at emerging markets to enable Internet access for people who earn $3000 or less per year.
The usability for U.S. consumers isn’t as convincing, but, if you think about it, such a product makes a lot of sense for families who would like to have multiple simple Internet devices available within a home. Simplicity and low power consumption are big selling points, but there is also less maintenance: You simply care for one host PC and the rest of the network takes care of itself. However, on the other side, if your host PC is down, you lose all connected computing stations (the L-series offers an opportunity to install a backup server via Ethernet.)
Dukker told us that he expects to have a consumer cloud computing device for the U.S. ready by H2 2009. It is interesting to note that these devices are flexible in their application areas and Ncomputing apparently has begun to sell its boards to companies that are developing Internet Kiosks, set top boxes, all-in-one monitors and TVs.
Why Intel should watch
Dukker said that Ncomputing has sold about 1 million computing boxes in 80 countries over the past 20 months. Compared to Intel’s 160 million+ sold CPUs per year, that is a drop in the bucket.
However, companies such as Intel need to sell more chips every year. In an increasingly saturated market, that means that Intel not only needs to expand its product portfolio, it also needs to expand its customer base. The most promising customer bases are mobile users on the one side and several billion potential customers in emerging markets on the other. Intel has been feverishly working to conquer emerging markets: While the Atom processor appears to be limited to SFF notebooks and MIDs at the time, it will also be Intel’s product for emerging market computers. Intel can produce the chip for $6 per piece, but somehow we believe that the company has shot itself in the foot with outrageous tray pricing. The low-power version of Atom is priced from $20 to $135, excluding $25 for the necessary SCH chipset. The more power hungry nettop/netbook version of the chip with Diamondville core is priced from $29 to $44, excluding the chipset.
Intel can tell us as often as it wants that prices are determined by market demand, but we doubt that these prices will allow Intel to reach millions of new customers in emerging markets. And as long as Intel ignores this opportunity, companies such as Ncomputing could be able to establish their customer base in potentially huge new markets – with a product that can be built for $11 per seat.
If you think about Intel’s strategy to sell more chips every year and compare it to Ncomputing’s strategy, it appears that Ncomputing works entirely against Intel’s model. Splitting one PC into seven computing devices means that a processor manufacturer will lose a revenue opportunity of six network computers. As a side note, Dukker said that Ncomputing is working with AMD to deploy host PCs. He told us that AMD concluded that there is no possible to market a PC with a profit for low-cost markets and apparently decided to go with a access terminal solution to expand its reach.
Ncomputing’s cloud computing model is a no-brainer in third-world countries and could make a lot of sense for average American and European household as well. Popularizing cloud computing in traditional computer markets will be difficult, since people are used to own their software and store files locally. However, users who are new to computers will not need to be convinced of the benefits of cloud computing – especially if a traditional PC is out of their reach.
Dukker may have found a formula how to create a product that is affordable for people in emerging and third-world countries and still make money on it. With a production cost of $11 per seat, he has enough room to adjust his pricing model in different markets and different environments.
It is not difficult to imagine Ncomputing to quickly gain traction in emerging markets and appeal to users in mature markets as well. If this is the case, Intel may have a big problem and could face its biggest threat yet. Of course, until Ncomputing isn’t ready to play with Intel just yet, but Dukker believes in his opportunity: “There are market dynamics even Intel can’t stop,” he told TG Daily.
Cloud computing is one of the big business opportunities for IT companies these days. Ncomputing’s concept is the best I have seen so far. I will check back in a few years to see if my prediction about the next Google was right.

Adobe releases Creative Suite 4

Adobe released details Monday about Creative Suite 4, its first update to more than a dozen design and editing tools since Adobe CS3 some 17 months ago.

The costs of the applications, set to reach consumers in October, haven't changed since CS3, but remain hefty. Should longtime users upgrade?

Of course that depends on the specific tools you need. However, we suspect that only the most well-heeled will jump at the chance, as CS4 shares the majority of tools with its predecessor. Perhaps more dramatic, life-changing alterations will come with the next Creative Suite. That said, time-saving tweaks to Illustrator and Flash in particular could lure professionals immersed in them to upgrade.

With CS4, Adobe aimed to unify the interfaces of more than a dozen applications, including Flash and other former properties of Macromedia. You'll see similar pull down menus for toggling among workspaces that you can customize, as well as Flash-based panels that nicely snap open and shut. Corporate design departments will find plenty of enhancements for their teams to share work more quickly.

Adobe continues to improve integration among the applications. After Effects, as only one example, can import Photoshop 3D layers and export content directly into Flash.

Options for working with high-definition video and mobile content expand too, with support for the latest formats as well as for making Adobe AIR applications. Among other highlights:

Photoshop CS4 will use your computer's graphics chip for the first time, while offering support for 64-bit Windows.

At long last, you can handle more than one project at a time in Illustrator, thanks to the new multiple Artboards feature.

Flash CS4 has a rebuilt animation model, so you can make objects move on the stage in two quick steps. And Flash introduces a new, XML-based file format.

Dreamweaver provides plenty of shortcuts to CSS coding, including within the Properties panel.

We've been toying with the beta code of CS4 for several weeks. Check out our first take reviews and videos of the six suites and their individual applications for more details. We'll report back with rated reviews after working with the final code.

Source: news.CNET.com

Google: Yahoo! Deal Not Bad For Competition

The other day, Eric Schmidt blamed Microsoft for fanning the flames of controversy over Google's proposed advertising deal with Yahoo!. He did also note, however, that Google had probably failed to explain the deal well enough, and that this had contributed to said controversy as well.

Tim ArmstrongWell, Tim Armstrong on the Google Public Policy Blog has taken the initiative and explained a little about just what the Google-Yahoo! deal will entail. Yesterday, he answered questions about ad pricing, and today he talked about competition, which is really the heart of the controversy, and the reason why the whole deal is under investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice.

Armstrong says that the deal is not bad for competition, contrary to popular belief. He compares the deal to Toyota providing hybrid technology to competitor General Motors. Yahoo! plans to reinvest the money it makes from the deal into improving its own services, and Yahoo! will still have the freedom to make similar deals with other companies, should it choose to do so.

Yahoo! will still have its own ads in addition to Google's, but the question has come up of why anyone would want to keep advertising with Yahoo!'s service. The answer to that is Yahoo! will be dictating when it wants to use Google ads. "They have stated that their plan is [to] show them primarily on pages where few or no ads currently appear," says Armstrong. "The only way for an advertiser to guarantee placement for their ads on Yahoo! is to advertise through the Yahoo! platform itself."

Armstrong also assures everyone that Google and Yahoo! will not share personally identifiable user data, which should alleviate potential privacy concerns. As for the notion that the Google-Yahoo! deal will control 90% of the search advertising market, Armstrong says it's "about expanding the pie, not dividing it differently."

Schmidt said at a Media roundtable the other day that Google expected all of the scrutiny the deal is attracted, and that the company was not very worried about it because they have been "playing by the rules." As of now, Google still plans to go forward with the deal next month, provided it is not blocked by the government.

Australian company launches 3D Internet tool

An Australian company on Thursday launched a free tool it says offers web browsers a world-first opportunity to view the Internet in three dimensions.

Melbourne-based ExitReality said its application allows users to turn any regular website into a 3D virtual environment, where an avatar representing them can walk around and meet other browsers viewing the same website.

Founder Danny Stefanic said that previously only specialized websites such as Second Life and World of Warcraft allowed users to enter a 3D environment.

“ExitReality goes far beyond that,” he said. “It allows you to view not just one website but the entire World Wide Web in 3D.”

Browsers can use the tool to turn their social networking pages on sites such as Facebook and MySpace into a virtual apartment, where photographs are displayed on the wall and links to friends are “doors” leading to other apartments.

Users can customize their flats by “decorating” with 3D versions of couches from stores such as Ikea or downloading an e-jukebox to play music clips stored on their personal page.

Similarly, using ExitReality on video-sharing website YouTube creates a virtual cinema, where the browser’s avatar sits next to other users also logged on to watch the clip they have selected.

Stefanic said the tool transformed the web from a solo experience into one that could be shared with friends and other users interested in the same content.

“The user can see and share experiences with their friends while chatting with them and other people at either their own website or another billion web pages,” he said.

Stefanic said there was a wealth of 3D content on the Internet that conventional web search engines ignored.

He said ExitReality made use of this content to render regular websites into 3D.

A regular two-dimensional news site appears as a 3D streetscape, with stories and photographs highlighted as billboards, while sections such as sport and business are virtual lanes that the user can navigate their avatar to.

The banner advertisements that normally sit atop the top of websites appear in the virtual sky, trailing from digital aeroplanes.

Stefanic said such effects made the website more interesting for users, meaning they were more likely to spend more time browsing the page.

“Users would normally spend no longer than a couple of minutes on a 2D website,” he said. “In a 3D environment, this time can extend to half an hour, creating a huge potential for the website owner to maximize user engagement.”

The tool, a 3.5 megabyte Internet plug-in that takes about 20 seconds to download, is available for free.

Stefanic said ExitReality would make money in a similar manner to Google, by generating a mixture of “sponsored” links paid for by advertisers and “organic” non-commercial results when browsers use the search engine.

Create virtual folders in Windows Vista

Within Windows Vista, Search is an omnipresent feature, available in a number of locations, except the desktop itself. Available within most applications, Search eliminates the need to think in terms of file structure. Files located from a variety of sources quickly become accessible. And when you run a search for content on your hard disk, if it's a search you expect to use on a regular basis, it can be saved.


Within Windows Vista Windows Explorer, saved searches are color-coded blue so that they are distinct from the traditional hard drive folders. Click any saved search, and Windows Vista will run the search query again and instantly populate the search result folder with the latest information. Say, for example, you're interested in birding. As you acquire more information about, say, raptors, including various documents, images, and media files, your saved search result folder on raptors will include the latest information, no matter where it is saved on your hard drive. In Windows XP, file folders remained static unless you drag and drop new files into designated folders.


If your saved search folder on raptors becomes too large, you can reorganize the results into groups or reorganize by metatags, displaying the content on ospreys separately from that of bald eagles.

Windows Vista sets the stage for structure-less file storage, perhaps in the next Windows version. By freeing files from the folder or storage medium they reside in, users can associate data as they will, creating ad hoc collections on the fly as needed, collections that can be dissolved as quickly as they were created once they are no longer needed. This eliminates the need for dragging and dropping files, and remembering where a particular file resides.

Best of Chrome: 'Google's new Trojan Horse'

There's a lot of great commentary out there on Google's new Chrome browser, but the most insightful and incisive review I've seen thus far is Andrew Orlowski's piece for The Register, wherein he calls out Chrome as a "Trojan Horse for...Google Gears."

Today, Chrome is simply a technology demonstration - and I can't see Firefox users with their carefully-cultivated selection of add-ons, or Opera users, making the jump any time soon. But Chrome is a Trojan Horse for bundling Google's Gears onto your PC - and in the hope that manufacturers look to Google services for new Eee-type lightweight PCs, perhaps running something like gOS, the Ubuntu-derivative.

Gears is simply designed to make Google's online services more attractive, and makes it looks like Google's is setting the standard: leading where everyone else follows.

No one thought this was just about building a better browser. In that department, Firefox is and will remain the hands-down favorite for anyone not shackled to Internet Explorer (and Firefox is much faster for most applications). Indeed, I suspect that Firefox still has a big hand to play on its own as the standard platform for Web applications.

But Google is about to crank up its Microsoft-killer strategy a notch. Adding a retail component--built on top Ubuntu, most likely--would be the finishing touch. But long before Google takes that road, it needs to get application developers in its corner. Enter Chrome.

It's an interesting play, and certainly one worth watching as the juggernaut of the desktop (Microsoft) dukes it out with the juggernaut of the Web (Google). Fun times.

10 things we'd like to see in Chrome

So far we're pretty smitten with Google's Chrome. It's certainly not without its faults, but for version 1.0 of a browser it's pretty sharp. We've compiled a list of 10 things we'd really like to see added or tweaked. Some come from other browsers, and some are just improvements on some of the existing features. Google, we hope you're listening.

1. Profile roaming between multiple browsers. This may be a pipe dream, but if Foxmarks for Firefox has proved anything, syncing up your bookmarks between multiple machines is awesome. Doing the same with passwords, settings, and history would be even better. Considering Google already has a way for your browser to send data back to the mothership, and a hosted Web history service of its own, a little sync using my Google account doesn't seem that hard does it?

2. Better bookmark management. Speaking of bookmarks, the bookmarking system in Chrome is about as basic as it gets. "Stripped-down" might be a better way to describe it. On the outset, it seems as robust as Firefox 3's with a really simple one-click way to save links. Where the system falls apart is the lack of tools for organization, and a complete lack of a back-up tool to save your short (or long) list of favorite sites. Of course, a bookmarks plug-in like Delicious would help sort this out, which brings us to the next yearning...

Chrome's bookmark management is incredibly sparse compared with some of the more mature offerings from browsers like Firefox 3. (click to enlarge)

(Credit: CBS Interactive)

3. Plug-ins. Google has acknowledged that plug-ins are on the road map, which is a good thing. Here's how the search giant can totally one-up Mozilla, though: let me install and make changes to extensions without having to restart the browser. Nothing is worse than having 30 tabs open and having to restart, even if it remembers what I had open before. This reminds me...

4. Saved sessions/Warning messages when closing multiple tabs. Firefox's little warning for when you're closing a group of tabs was a huge lifesaver in version two. Firefox 3 brought with it a way to save that grouping of open tabs for later. Chrome has neither of these features. Accidentally closing your browser with a slew of tabs open means they're gone for good--that is unless you set it from the default option of clearing what you were looking at. Chrome is also nice enough to tell you some of the most recently closed tabs back on its special start page, but that's it.

5. A full-screen mode. I love the minimalism of Chrome, but sometimes I just want those extra 60-90 vertical pixels back. Give me a keyboard shortcut for this too, and I'll be in screen hog heaven.

6. A more customizable interface. The blue is neat, but getting that great deep purple found in incognito mode is enough of a tease to make me want to change the way it looks based on how I'm feeling. Plus, you've taken away the nice special Windows-theme coloring I had when you got rid of the top of the application, so let me choose how I want it to look. Bonus points for a tie-dye mode or something that changes depending on what time of day it is--like your personalized homepage service iGoogle.

7. A way to drag "applications" back into the main browser. The option to turn a certain site into a self-contained browser window with a stripped-down interface is great. However, the inability to drag it back into an open Chrome browser window is maddening when you're trying to re-open some real estate on the task bar. You can do this with existing tabs and windows, and it works great.

8. A Mac/Linux version. The lack of a Mac client has left the growing percentage of Mac users in a bit of a tizzy. Worse yet, based on Google's track record with some of its other cross-platform software offerings like Google Earth and Google Desktop search, the Mac has fared a little worse with slower release schedules and less features than its PC siblings. Hopefully new features will be rolled out to all the platforms at about the same time.

9. A pop-up blocker that blocks. Clearly Google is trying to shake things up with a pop-up blocker that really should be called a "pop-up relocator," since it not only lets them open but also load. Frankly, this drives me nuts since I have to close them down to get them off the screen. Also if it's really important and something I meant to click, I have to go drag it off from the bottom of the screen.

10. A regular old search box. Yes progress is good and the "omnibar" does a pretty slam-dunk job of getting new searches going, but let's get some of the ambiguity away from that thing and have an option to leave it for URLs only. Also, a separate search box would let me pick from the other multitude of search providers in addition to Google without compromising my screen real estate.

Google Chrome extensions: Not yet, but later

One of Firefox's initial claims to fame is the fact that the browser can be extended with a multitude of plug-ins, and even though Microsoft caught up with Internet Explorer, Firefox still has an extension edge over Google's new Chrome Web browser.

For now, "We don't have that in the beta today, but we definitely plan an extension API," or application programming interface, Sundar Pichai, a Google vice president of product management, said at the Chrome launch event here Tuesday. "It is one of the things we will get to next."

Firefox extensions cover a wide swath of abilities, from synchronizing bookmarks to debugging Web site performance to showing detailed exposure data for online photographs. The extensibility has attracted scads of programmers, too, which is strategically important for most computing efforts.

Google, no doubt, envies the Firefox extension assets. But it's hard to imagine the company mustering much enthusiasm for one of the most popular Firefox extensions, AdBlock Plus, which suppresses many advertisements.

Google has a strong focus on giving Web users a good experience--indeed, it said its studies show that users find the text ads placed next to search results an overall improvement. But Google's business depends on advertising, and its $3.1 billion DoubleClick acquisition is geared to give the company strength in just the sort of online display advertisements that AdBlock is designed to counteract.

Extensions shouldn't be confused with a related technology, plug-ins, which includes software such as Sun Microsystems' Java, Microsoft's Silverlight, and Adobe Systems' Flash. Existing plug-ins work in Chrome, Pichai said.

Google Ignites a New Browser War With Microsoft by Unveiling One of Its Own This Week

In its most frontal and aggressive attack on Microsoft yet, sources with knowledge of the project said Google is preparing to unveil a new browser–ready for download to users as early as tomorrow–to try to loosen Microsoft’s iron grip on the most important piece of software for navigating the Internet.

In addition, Google Blogoscoped has published a comic book that Google is apparently using to explain the technical aspects of its open-source browser, which is called Chrome.

[UPDATE: Here is a post on Google's official confirmation of the browser launch in 100 countries tomorrow, which was released on its blog this afternoon. The beta version will be initially available only for Windows, but Google said Mac and Linux versions were coming soon.]

Until now, the Google-Microsoft battles felt more like a Cold War, mostly limited to Google (GOOG) poking at Microsoft (MSFT) via the development of small-scale Web-based software to compete with Microsoft’s dominant Word, PowerPoint and other such products, and Microsoft’s thus-far unsuccessful attempts to break Google’s lock on the search market.

But with this move, which has been rumored since 2004, the war most definitely has gone red-hot, as Google aims to grab a chunk of Microsoft’s huge browser market share, which various surveys put at about three-quarters of the market.

The efforts to do this have been well known within the company for a long time, although the timing of its launch has not.

But Google FedExed the comic too early to Blogoscoped–who is based in Germany–and possibly others, which makes BoomTown really appreciate express mail more than ever.

(I also obtained a copy and have posted the comic book here, and Digital Daily’s John Paczkowski has written a quick executive summary of it.)

Sources said Google has made the move to create and distribute a browser due to worry about what new features in IE8 could do to its search business.

These features include privacy changes that could prevent Google from collecting information related to the effectiveness of its ads, quick-linking to Microsoft mapping and other offerings, and a more robust search bar that is also more Microsoft-centric.

To combat Microsoft’s IE dominance in recent years, Google has been backing Mozilla’s Firefox browser, which grew out of the ashes of the once-powerful, now-irrelevant Netscape browser like a phoenix to claim an astonishing 18 percent of the market.

That market share has climbed from 11 percent just two years ago–even against Microsoft’s IE juggernaut with 74 percent and Apple’s Safari browser with six percent.

Mozilla’s recent launch of Firefox 3 had a record-setting debut day in mid-June, with 8.3 million downloads in 24 hours.

Google recently renewed a deal with Mozilla making its search engine the homepage and search bar default until 2011. In return, Google pays Mozilla royalties for Google ad clicks that come from searches originating in the Firefox browser.

(Here’s a recent post I did about a visit I made to Mozilla’s HQ, right around the corner from Google, as well as a video interview I did with its CEO John Lilly.)

But obviously, Mozilla’s efforts were not enough for Google, which clearly has decided it must own and distribute a browser, especially since the browser has become the most significant piece of software related to the Internet, and the fulcrum on which most of Google’s business lies.

In other words, Google is declaring the browser critical to its future and, in this regard, it is entirely right.

Google 'starting from scratch' with own browser, Chrome

Word surfaced Monday of a Web "comic book" introducing Google Chrome, the search giant's long-rumored open-source browser project. While the illustrations, created by cartoonist Scott McCloud, were not announced by Google, they do contain the quotes and likenesses of 19 Google developers.

A Web comic, reposted on Google Blogoscoped, introduces Google Chrome.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

The detailed, 38-page comic appeared on Google Blogoscoped, an unofficial Google blog. Update: The comic is now available on Google Book Search. The book is broken down into five main sections covering stability; speed; search and the user experience, security, and standards. Here are the key features, according to the book:

Browser tabs will be detachable.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

Stability
Each tab will run in its own process. These processes will be completely isolated from each other, will be killable from the operating system's process manager, and will be sandboxed to prevent them from accessing information on the user's computer. This architecture should lead to a more stable and more consistent browsing experience--performance of the browser should not degrade over time.

Google is using its search index to prioritize testing of the browser--the pages that are linked to the most from Google Search are getting the most automated hits to make sure Chrome is behaving correctly on them.

Speed
The browser is being written with WebKit, the open-source engine at the core of Apple's Safari and Google's Android. The browser is also getting a new Javascript virtual machine, V8. It's said to be a better solution for complex and rich Web applications--it should yield better performance as well as "smoother drag and drops" in interactive applications.

Search and user experience
In Chrome, browser tabs will take over the interface, becoming the primary navigational element. Each tab will get its own window controls. Users will be able to tear off tabs into standalone windows. (Related: developers will be able to control which window controls appear in a tab, creating, if they wish, Web applications that are embedded in a browser but that appear to be more like traditional desktop apps.)

Chrome's URL entry field will be called the "Omnibox," and, like Mozilla's "Awesome bar," will feed you suggestions based on your browsing history and live search results. It will be respectful of users, the comic says: "Inline completions will never flicker, never flash. It's perfect, aesthetically non-distracting."

Chrome will integrate URL entry and search queries into the Omnibox.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

The browser's default start page will show thumbnails of the user's most frequently visited pages and a list of their top searches. There will also be a private browsing mode, as IE 8 has.

Security
Chrome's architecture lends itself to secure browsing. Each Web page, or tab, runs in its own process, and is blocked from accessing other processes on the computer. "We've taking the existing process boundary," the comic says, "and made it into a jail." Different and more flexible permissions are being developed for plug-ins, however.

A database and API to access phishing and scam sites will be used in Chrome (and made public), which will hopefully reduce "zero-day" scam exploits. The browser will be constantly updated with this information.

Standards
The browser will be released as an open-source project. Also, Google will build the open-source local runtime Gears into the browser, and is hoping that it is taking up widely to "improve the base functionality of all browsers."

Yes, this is big
CNET News.com Editor in Chief Dan Farber's analysis of Google Chrome Monday was this: "It would be in line with other Google open-source projects, such as OpenSocial and Google Gears. Creating a competitor to Firefox, as well as Internet Explorer and Opera, could spur more innovation."

"Open sourcing the code is a smart way to avoid the 'Google wants to take over the world' fear, but it seems that Google has ambitions to create a comprehensive Internet operating system, including a browser, applications, middleware and cloud infrastructure."

The browser's start page will show thumbnails or previews of the user's most visited sites.

(Credit: Google Blogoscoped)

No official confirmation from Google yet, although Kara Swisher of All Things D cites sources who say that Google will make a Chrome download available to users by as early as tomorrow.

Google steps on Firefox with its new Zune...err, Chrome browser

Despite Google's recent extension of its partnership with Mozilla, it was just a matter of time before Google got too big for anyone else's browser and decided to write its own. Or, rather, it was just a matter of time before Google decided to borrow the best of others' open-source projects and extend them, as this is what Google generally does.

And so Google has done with its newly announced open-source Chrome browser:

What we really needed was not just a browser, but also a modern platform for web pages and applications, and that's what we set out to build.

So writes Sundar Pichai, vice president of product management at Google, and so plans Google. The difference this time is that Google will actually have to contribute code back, making its Chrome browser an experiment in community building, rather than merely community borrowing. It's also an experiment in distributing software, not merely services, an area in which Google has not made much of a dent to date.

Ars technica thinks Chrome sounds really innovative, what with its ability to segment the processes running in different browser tabs, among other things. Mozilla's John Lilly welcomes the competition and continued partnership with Google, but can't help but strike an ominous chord:

...[T]he parts where [Google and Mozilla are] different, with different missions, will continue to be separate. Mozilla's mission is to keep the Web open and participatory....

Lilly doesn't say it, but presumably he could have finished the sentence this way: "...And Google's mission is to drive as much traffic and advertisements through its sites and services." This is where I believe Chrome could both thrive and stagnate.

Google has been bankrolling Mozilla's Firefox, and it may well be that Google sees further life, at least in the short term, for a strong Firefox, as ZDNet's Larry Dignan suggests. But I can't imagine Google enjoying this whole "sharing" thing for very long. Not if it's successful with Chrome.

A Zune moment?
Nor can I imagine Web developers getting excited about developing for yet another browser. It took years for anyone to start developing for Firefox, and no one got excited about developing for Flock or other spin-offs of Firefox. Google has the brand equity to make people pay attention to Chrome in the way start-up Flock never did, but could Chrome be Google's Zune moment?

In the media player world, the iPod reigned despite Microsoft coming out with a good-but-not-good-enough alternative. Firefox has managed to gain a 20 percent market share after years of fighting: 72 percent of Web users still slum with Internet Explorer. Are these folks magically going to dump IE just because Google showed up to the party? Unlikely.

Indeed, successful as Google has been, it's even more notable for its many failures. Take a look at all the products and services it offers. How many do you use? For that matter, how many have you even heard of? A handful?

Many will suggest that Google's entrance to this market, like others that it has entered (Froogle with comparison shopping, anyone?), is game over for Firefox. I couldn't disagree more, and here's a key reason:

Google has failed in its attempts to become a software distributor. Yes, the Google Desktop has attracted some fans, but nowhere near a respectable minority. Google knows how to piggyback on others' desktop clients. It knows how to monetize Web services fantastically well. It knows far less about driving downloads and uptake of its products, excepting its core search functionality.

The only Chrome lining I see in this experiment from Google, at least in the short term, is that Google will have to contribute source code back to Mozilla, Apple, and the other projects and organizations from which it will be borrowing code. Google has done much better lately with the open-source development community, more freely contributing back to a range of projects. Google Chrome will accentuate and improve this.

But for now, Google Chrome is unlikely to change anyone's lives...or market share. I think Google's forays into new markets like this is good for the industry, and good for Google. I welcome the move. I'm just not holding my breath for world domination anytime soon.

 
Copyright © 2010 | Shotidave - Digital Magazine